1. James Harrison
2. DeMarcus Ware
3. Clay Matthews
To me Harrison is the better OLB because he is a more complete player.
Toes Before Hos
Hard to argue with that. Harrison is more well rounded than Ware, but if you gave me a choice between the two I'd take Ware because he's more athletic and a better pass rusher. When given a chance he's also been very good in coverage and run support, but he just doesn't get asked to do that as much as Harrison does.
CMIII is a decent pick for #3. Terrell Suggs has a good case though.
Give your answer to this question below!
DeMarcus Ware highlights. The big sacks, hard hits and great plays by the Dallas Cowboys All Pro linebacker.
Cowboys defensive player to watch: DeMarcus Ware
By Mike Jones (RAY STUBBLEBINE - REUTERS) How he beats you: Blessed with size, speed and power, the 6-foot-4, 260-pound Ware ranks among the elite pass-rushers in the league, and Redskins' offensive coordinator Kyle Shanahan says the outside linebacker ...
Read more on Washington Post (blog)
DeMarcus Ware: Redskins RBs pose a problem
After scouting both running backs on film, however, Ware said that Hightower and Helu aren'ta “thunder and lightning” type of running back tandem. Instead, both can hurt a team in nearly the exact same way. “Those two guys, it's weird, but they run the ...
Read more on Washington Post (blog)
Lions' Jim Schwartz doesn't commit to Nick Fairley playing vs. Cowboys
On facing Dallas linebacker DeMarcus Ware, the NFL leader with five sacks: “He's very good. Every week, it seems as though we have one of those kind of guys. So whether it's Jared Allen or Tamba Hali's as good as there is in the NFL, DeMarcus Ware's as ...
Read more on Detroit Free Press
Cowboys look to get DeMarcus Ware free
By Calvin Watkins IRVING -- For the bulk of the Cowboys-Jets game, outside linebacker DeMarcus Ware lined up on both sides of the line trying to avoid the constant double-teams that hounded him last season. Ware started the game lined up over Jets ...
Read more on ESPN (blog)
demarcus ware
6 comments:
At 32 James Harrison's production is going to start to go down. At 25 Clay Matthews isn't even at his prime yet. In addition while Harrison had Woodley to help him out and draw away pressure, Clay Matthews was constantly double teamed and still made big plays. Clay Matthews also had a leg injury that prevented him from going to practice mid-season and he was still bringing it on game day. Clay Matthew's athleticism, upper body strength, and sheer determination make him, in my opinion, a much better OLB than Harrison.
I think it is still Harrison.
since he didn't start for several years, he doesn't have as much wear and tear, as most OLB's his age.
Clay is right behind him, will probably catch him in a couple years.
but for now, it's still Harrison.
I agree with you completely. Harrison, Ware, Matthews in that order although there are some other players worth mentioning. Bur Harrison and Ware are a lock on 1 and 2
I agree. Harrison is a inferior pass rusher than the other two, but he makes it up by being better at run stopping and in coverage. He's also better at going after the ball, 6 FFs, 2 INTs compared to Clay's 2 FFs and 1 int, and Ware's 2 FF and 0 INTs. Harrison also has around 40 more tackles than the other two..
You are a complete retard. Harrison is not a more complete player what so ever.
1. mathews
2. Harrison
3. Ware.
I agree with you.
Post a Comment